Because there doesn't look like any "Formal" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can a number of you supply a place to begin with this mixture and issues to think about when working this Load up?

H4831SC Powder available in stock now. Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's a shorter grain sizing, consequently, the designation SC or limited Slice. The shorter, more compact kernels enable the powder to move through the powder measures a lot more easily, assisting to alleviate the continuous reducing of granules.

The point that the H4831 is certainly a slower burning powder is specifically why you happen to be viewing higher velocities received with that powder, rather than Everything you've observed Using the IMR things. Also very good powder, but relatively improved suited to a bit smaller instances which has a bit less ability.

Minnesota H4831SC is my head to from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am preserving the small I've left for drop 2021. I would start off very low and work your way up, according to what load data you look at for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.

INgunner54 reported: It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Found a node and shot some groups.

Given that there would not look like any "official" Load Data in existence for this Load, can a number of you provide a starting point with this mix and issues to consider when Operating this Load up?

Any person loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcomes, any data you are able to share? Should also point out I have some ELD-X 175's I would like to exam out, In case you have information on that likewise.

While this is most likely real, there is a whole lot more to it than simply not blowing yourself up. He couldn't strike prairie canines further than about one hundred fifty yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't doing everything favorable for his grouping ability with People loads.

I have uncovered the precise opposite to be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally accurate powder in my three hundred Acquire Mag.

locutus mentioned: I nevertheless have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows as a result of my powder actions easily.

Validate YOUR AGE Sure states prohibit advertising or marketing and advertising of h4831sc firearms, ammunition, and relevant firearm parts to minors. We’d like making sure that you’re eighteen decades of age or more mature just before making it possible for you to buy our web-site. Will you be eighteen several years of age or older?

Back again to outdated web page Close If there is everything in the cart, it won't be introduced more than for the outdated web page.

I know the H4831SC provides a far better load density But I believe I've more than enough space in my scenario for the normal H4831.

I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions ended up sub MOA with 4831sc with minimal h4831sc to min rates. I’m speaking 2700 (it's possible 2800) fps, it was a very low 60s grain charge in the Norma case. Not what I used to be on the lookout h4831 vs h4831sc for, but correct Even so.